Corker Urges President Not to Circumvent Confirmation Process for Consumer Protection Bureau

WASHINGTON - MAY 06:  Senate Financial Services Committee members Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) (L) and Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) hold a news conference about a proposed ammendment to the financial services reform legislation before the Senate at the U.S. Capitol May 6, 2010 in Washington, DC. Senate Republicans are unified in the opposition to the bill and the powers it would give a proposed consumer protection agency within the Fed.

In a letter sent to “President Barack Obama today, U.S. Senator Bob Corker, R-Tenn., a member of the Senate Banking Committee, urged the President not to circumvent the Senate confirmation process by appointing an interim head of the newly created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,” according to a press release.

I am writing to express my concern over reports that you plan to appoint an interim head of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, circumventing the intent of the legislation passed over the summer which established a confirmation process.  I hope, as sometimes happens in Washington, these reports prove to be unfounded.

It is a key responsibility of the U.S. Senate and its committees of jurisdiction to advise and consent and one that I believe was not meant to be abdicated by the Executive Branch’s use of appointments. I strongly believe the intent of the Dodd-Frank legislation was to have the head of this bureau go through the nomination, vetting and confirmation process.

This particular position, one that was created just months ago, is unprecedented in the nature of its unfettered and unchecked authorities, which makes the confirmation process even more important to the interests of the American people.  The individual who heads this bureau will be able to make rules, with ultimately no checks and balances, that could have broad reaching implications for the U.S. economy as it relates to accessing credit, social justice and the safety and soundness of the U.S. banking system.  The job is disproportionately reliant on the decisions of one individual with access to large sums of taxpayer monies to carry out the agency agenda. Taxpayers deserve better stewardship in the determination of who will take on this responsibility.

I hope you will take seriously the intent and will of Congress to have a Senate confirmation process for the head of this new agency.  While I was disappointed in the outcome and lack of checks placed on this agency, I believe that the nomination, vetting, and confirmation process is an important tool to ensure that a qualified, nonpartisan individual will head this agency and be accountable to Congress, taxpayers and the safety and soundness of the banking system of this country in the face of tenuous economic conditions.

ABC News reported today that the President “will announce this week that Elizabeth Warren, the Harvard Law School professor who first proposed the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, will be named to a special position reporting to both him and to the Treasury Department and tasked with heading the effort to get the new federal agency standing.”

(credit image – daylife/getty)

3 Comments

Filed under Appointments, Consumer Protection, White House

3 responses to “Corker Urges President Not to Circumvent Confirmation Process for Consumer Protection Bureau

  1. Roq

    If the Senate can’t get it’s act together enough to stop anonymous holds and do it’s *duty* to confirm presidential nominees (many far, *far* less contentious than Ms. Warren), then they have no right to complain when the Executive branch circumvents them so it can do *its* duty.

    You’ve made this bed, now lie in it. Government by loophole. Hope you like it.

  2. If you keep running your head into a stone wall, eventually your head will hurt enough to quit doing so. At that point, one must find a way to go around the wall if the mission is important enough.

    Why should any President, Dem or Repub, take a road that they already know leads to no where.

    The Republicans have been setting Obama’s agenda since he took office. Therefore, they have no reason to think they can’t be successful in the Warren matter. Someone of importance once said *If you don’t know what to do with Wall Street bankers, find out what they and their protectors don’t want then do just that*.

    Obama and the Dems in Congress gave away Health Care Reform and Financial Reform to the Repubs. Maybe he’s decided to try a little harder to protect the consumer this time rather than Wall Street. And Warren is the very person to do that.

  3. NOTHING FOR POOR PEOPLE!
    FREE THE RICH PEOPLE!!!!!!!
    NOTHING FOR POOR PEOPLE!
    FREE THE RICH PEOPLE!!!!!!!
    NO MONEY FOR POOR PEOPLE!
    FREE THE RICH PEOPLE!!!!!!
    NOTHING FOR POOR PEOPLE!
    FREE THE RICH!!!!!!!
    FREE THE RICH!!!!!!!
    FREE THE RICH!!!!!!!
    VOTE!
    VOTE!
    VOTE FOR RICH PEOPLE!

Leave a comment