Documents released by the Senate show that a “civil rights group on whose board Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor served filed racial bias lawsuits over employment examinations that resemble a Connecticut case in which she ruled against white firefighters,” the AP reports.
The Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund represented Hispanic sanitation workers in New York City who wanted to stop white employees from getting promotions because, they argued, the qualifying exam unfairly disadvantaged minorities. The case unfolded as Sotomayor chaired the organization’s board of directors’ litigation committee, although there is no evidence that she had any role in the group’s decision to participate in the lawsuits, or in formulating or drafting any of their legal arguments.
The New York case bears strong similarities to a much-discussed lawsuit Sotomayor ruled on last year as afederal appeals court judge, which involved the reverse discrimination claims of white firefighters in New Haven, Conn. They sued after the city threw out its promotion test because too few minorities passed. The judicial panel she joined ruled against the white firefighters in the case, Ricci v. DeStefano — a ruling theSupreme Court reversed last Monday.
The sanitation workers’ case and similar ones that include a series of lawsuits against the New York City Police Department are detailed in hundreds of pages of new material the Senate Judiciary Committee put on its Web site Friday after receiving them from the Puerto Rican civil rights group.
These discrimination suits have “drawn outrage from Republicans who allege they prove Sotomayor has endorsed an agenda of reverse discrimination and racial preferences for minorities.”
Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the senior Republican on the Judiciary panel, said this week that the Puerto Rican defense group has taken "extreme positions," and his office branded the organization "activist" in a background memo it released on Friday. His aides had accused Sotomayor’s allies of withholding the documents to prevent a thorough investigation of her past before confirmation hearings begin July 13.
Democrats “call the group, now known as LatinoJustice PRLDEF, mainstream, and argue that most of the material has nothing to do with Sotomayor.”
"This well-respected civil rights advocacy organization has cooperated and made an extensive effort to review decades-old records, most of which have no connection to Judge Sotomayor, to provide even more information to the committee," said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the Judiciary chairman, in a statement.
Some civil rights leaders “have expressed alarm at Sessions’ intense focus on Sotomayor’s time at PRLDEF, suggesting that it indicates that he’s unfairly targeting her because she’s Hispanic.”
Sessions has "been extraordinarily consistent in his disdain for civil rights and equal opportunity. I don’t know of very many prominent Latino or minority lawyers or judges who haven’t been involved in civil rights sometime in their lives," said Antonia Hernandez, a former president of MALDEF, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund. "It’s a message that’s being sent to minorities and Latinos that you cannot participate and be involved in the civic life of your community if you ever want to attain a position like this."
The above statement highlights the potential danger for Senate Republicans as they question Judge Sotomayor later this month. Democrats will be eager to paint them as anti-Hispanic if the questioning gets too tough or has a racial tinge to it.
Congress in Your Pocket
